Culture, Communications, Welsh Language, Sport, and International Relations Committee

Diolch yn fawr iawn, a diolch i bawb sy'n ymuno â ni heddiw. Yn amlwg, mae'r tywydd yn ein herbyn ni yn anffodus, felly dydy'n Cadeirydd ni, am y rhesymau yma, methu ymuno, a dwi'n meddwl bod hynny'n rheswm pam fod nifer o'r tystion yn rhithiol hefyd. A gaf i ofyn ar ddechrau'r cyfarfod, os gwelwch yn dda, os yna unrhyw fuddiannau i'w datgan gan aelodau'r pwyllgor o gwbl? Na, dim. Diolch yn fawr iawn i chi.

A gawn ni, felly, symud ymlaen, os gwelwch yn dda? Dwi yn ymwybodol, oherwydd yr heriau amser, mai dim ond tan 11 o'r gloch dŷn ni'n gallu cael y sesiwn yma. Felly, a gaf i ofyn, yn gyntaf, os gwnaiff y tystion i gyd gyflwyno'u hunain ar gyfer y record os gwelwch yn dda? Os cawn ni ddechrau, felly, efo'r Gweinidog. Gweinidog yr economi.

My name is Vaughan Gething, I'm the Minister for Economy in the Welsh Government.

Diolch.

I'm Dawn Bowden, Deputy Minister for Arts and Sport.

Diolch. Jason?

Bore da. I'm Jason Thomas, director of culture, sport and tourism in the Welsh Government.

Diolch. A Nicky.

Nicky Guy, deputy director for culture in the Welsh Government.

Gwych. Diolch yn fawr iawn. Dwi ddim yn gweld unrhyw dystion eraill efo ni ar y funud. Diolch i chi i gyd am ymuno â ni.

Os caf i ddechrau, felly, gan ofyn i chi—yn amlwg, mae gennym ni setliad ariannol heriol dros ben ar y funud, yn y maes diwylliant a chwaraeon yn benodol felly, a dŷn ni wedi clywed am nifer o heriau o ran hynny. Fedrwch chi amlinellu, os gwelwch yn dda, unrhyw ymarfer o ran blaenoriaethu dŷch chi wedi'i gynnal wrth ddatblygu'r gyllideb ddrafft hon?

Yes. If I talk in overall terms, then Dawn can talk about more of the specific portfolio areas that this committee has. In terms of our overall approach to the budget, we have, as a Government, prioritised health and care. We've prioritised local government, including education. Now, those are relative prioritisations, because, of course, we haven't had a flatline budget; we've actually had reductions to our budget in real terms, for reasons that everyone understands within inflation, but also, choices made by the UK Government at the last financial statement. That means that, to address the challenges that we all see around us, in our health and care system, in local government, and indeed, in education, that extra money comes at a cost, as it were, to other parts of Government. Now, that's a whole-Government strategy, so I'm signed up to that, this department is, and that has meant that we have had more challenging decisions to make to make sure that the budget passes.

In my previous budget scrutiny, I've explained that that means that, in some areas, we're not able to proceed, or we're proceeding at a slower pace. In this particular area, there has been relative protection in some areas. I think you'll find that we're still going to proceed with lots of our programmes in this section, but it does mean that there have been very difficult choices, and, obviously, if this, or any other committees want to call for extra spending in areas outside the priorities for the whole Government that I've stated, that means that the money has to be found in more reductions to other areas. So, it's an honest, but a very difficult challenge that will be familiar to lots of households, businesses and large organisations.

Alun Davies, if I can bring you in.

I'm grateful to the Minister for that, and he's absolutely right, of course—the easy thing about not being in Government is that there are no decisions to be taken, and everything can be seen as a priority. And I think we've all been through enough budget scrutiny sessions to have witnessed that.

But I want to understand, within Government and within budgets, the decision taking that you're making at the moment. You and I represent two very different constituencies—Cardiff South and Penarth and Blaenau Gwent—and I'm interested as to how you see the equality element or principle, if you like, of budgeting, because my constituents have access to far fewer cultural and sporting facilities than your constituents, so, I would anticipate the Government taking a principled decision that there would be a relatively greater investment in poorer parts—more deprived parts of the country—than in parts that don't suffer that deprivation in terms of availability of facilities, I'm talking about now. So, to what extent has that guided your thinking?

There's an overall perspective about the relative protections for healthcare, local government and education that actually is about recognising the stark socioeconomic differences in different parts of the country. And, actually, my constituency—some of it is a very pleasant, popular, middle-class town in Penarth, but actually, the southern Cardiff part of my constituency is actually pretty poor. If it was a local authority, it would be poorer than Merthyr, but bigger. So, the challenge, though, is that actually, for some of those people, even though they're physically close to a range of the assets that you refer to, in practical terms, it's a challenge. When we look at the individual parties within the portfolio, those are things that I think Dawn can address with her team, about how that then leads to what we've chosen in the programme for government to keep moving and how that does provide real access to facilities in communities, because I recognise the point that you're making.

Shall we bring the Deputy Minister in then?

Yes, on that specific—

Sorry—

I wanted to challenge the Minister, actually, on his answer, if I could. I don't disagree with the Minister's response. I recognise that there are parts of the Cardiff South and Penarth constituency that have very, very serious levels of poverty; I don't pretend that that isn't the situation. But my question wasn't about that and it wasn't about local government, and it wasn't about health, and it wasn't about the other things; it was about access to facilities. And what we all know is that the city of Cardiff provides a far higher level of sporting and cultural facilities than a community such as the communities I represent or, in fact, the Deputy Minister represents. So, I was wondering—and this is a question for the Minister rather than the Deputy Minister—how does he wish to see the equality element of budget process address that access-to-facilities question?

Well, the facilities in this area, though, is an area that the Deputy Minister takes a lead on—the overall resources available, and then, how they're deployed across the country to deal with practical access for different communities. And it goes, not just in this portfolio, but it's something that Lynne Neagle will be especially interested in—

Yes, yes, I get that.

—with her brief on public health, to make sure that there's practical access—. And, actually, with respect, again, if you lived in east Cardiff, even though, geographically, you're close to a range of facilities within Cardiff, actually, our practical challenge in getting access for people is not necessarily straightforward. But it's why we have a programme of investment: the capital investment that we're making; the investment we're making alongside governing bodies and the way that we're supporting local government, because a lot of what you were talking about would be local government-sponsored and run as well. So, the overall prioritisation in those areas is about protecting a range of those assets to provide practical access to communities across the country. So, I'm not trying to disagree and say that there isn't a challenge for us to address, but it is about the level of the detail in those choices that the Deputy Minister and other Ministers will make, because it actually matters to the whole-Government priorities that we set out at the outset.

But may I expand on that please, Minister? Obviously, you referenced in terms of prioritising health and so on, but we've also been outlining, in terms of sport and culture, the benefits in terms of the prevention agenda as well and especially with issues like mental health. Have there been discussions with colleagues around the health budget in particular around how that works in terms of both culture and sport, specifically?

Yes. We have regular conversations about the whole-Government works together. I had a meeting with the Deputy Minister for Mental Health and Well-being on a range of areas that go across our two portfolios, recognising—[Inaudible.] The challenge, though, is that, when you're setting all of these different priorities, everyone can make a case about how their area of activity adds to a broader preventative agenda and adds to a broader public health approach, and those are fair cases to make. You still, though, have to make choices within the budget available. Every good positive step we would want to take you can't take, because you just don't have the elastic to stretch that far. In the Chamber, we'll talk about all the things about treating people in emergency care, about people waiting for care, about general practice, and there's everything else as well.

Thank you, Minister. If I may bring the Deputy Minister in now.

Thank you, Chair. I think that is an important point. I think the Minister has answered Alun Davies's point around the prioritisation. The cross-departmental and cross-portfolio work that is going on is quite significant and is important to this preventative agenda. We've been saying for a long time that the preventative benefits of sport and culture are there for all to see. It's not just a sport and culture budget issue. This is an issue for many other departments.

We've got budget allocations, obviously, from my budget and from my portfolio. We've seen budget support from health through the transformation fund. We saw £0.5 million this year from the transformation fund, just as an example, to deliver the Fit Fans pilot between 2022 and 2024, running across six main football teams. That's a pilot that will be reviewed to see whether that has made a significant difference. That's come from the health budget but using sport and working with the FAW.

Obviously, the Minister's referred to local authority budgets. One of the things that the local authorities are responsible for and is their responsibility and their priority is around how they deliver culture and sport within their local authority areas and how that fits into their health and well-being agenda, as well as the health and well-being agenda of the Welsh Government. So, there's a local authority input to that, there's an education—

If I may, Deputy Minister, just on that point specifically, obviously, a number of those services are non-statutory services. How concerned are you about the impact we may see across Wales in terms of culture and sport because those elements are non-statutory? What considerations have been given in terms of budget planning in terms of those challenges? Because obviously, as you've rightly outlined, these are crucial services in our communities, but obviously non-statutory. So, I'm just interested in your view there.

They are non-statutory, but we still have an expectation around what a local authority needs to do to deliver on its well-being goals and on the well-being goals of the Welsh Government. That is reflected in the priorities that the Minister set out at the beginning. We have prioritised local government and health in terms of our budget allocations, and all local authorities have seen a much better than expected allocation this year. Certainly, in my area, the local authorities had not budgeted for anything like the settlement that they are receiving. So, it then becomes a decision for those local authorities about how they are going to prioritise issues over and above those statutory services.

Even within that, I think it is worth setting out that we have, for non-statutory services, allocated considerable amounts extra in a number of areas. Those are set out in the budget papers in the evidence brief that you had from us. Again, it goes across portfolios. We've talked about—. Well, I hadn't got to talking about the amount of money that's been allocated, for instance, to community-focused schools and the £24.5 million that's been put into the education budget around the sustainable communities for learning programme and so on. Those are non-statutory services that are being funded through other budget allocations as well as just from the culture budget allocations.

Thank you. If I just may ask one more question before we move on to another Member. Has there been, or are there plans to conduct, an assessment of the number of cultural and sporting venues that may be forced to close because of the economic situation?

In terms of assessments, my officials met with the chief leisure officers of Wales at the end of last year, and that was after the local government settlement had been published. From that, we have been made aware that there are no imminent threats because of the better than anticipated situation that I just referred to. We've seen some examples already, for instance, of local authorities that had been planning on taking particular actions, but they have rowed back from those having seen their budget allocation—Powys County Council being one case in point. They were going to close their swimming pools, and decided in light of their budget allocation that they are not now going to do that. So, we are not aware of any imminent threats to facilities, but we are very conscious and very aware of the very real threat to the leisure sector, particularly swimming pools. The fact that swimming pools have been left out of the UK Government's energy bill discount scheme, I think, is hugely important. I am having, immediately after this meeting, which is why I do have to leave at 11:00, a meeting with Swim Wales to discuss this very issue. This is a critical issue for some of these organisations where we have to try to bring pressure on the UK Government as well to include swimming pools and leisure facilities into that energy discount scheme, because if we don't do that, then I think that there is the danger of—

Thank you, Deputy Minister. Certainly, we have had evidence as a committee that supports that view, and we all know its importance. But, obviously, there are also cultural venues. As a committee, we've received correspondence about the Museum of Cardiff, formerly known as Cardiff Story, for instance, public libraries as well, which are being looked at for closure or scaling back and being volunteer led. So, can you perhaps comment on the cultural aspect specifically?

Yes, sure. We have also made additional provision for areas within the cultural sector. Again, that's all set out in the evidence that we presented to you. We have provided £3.7 million in the financial year 2022-23 to the National Library of Wales, National Museum Wales—

If I may stop you—apologies. I meant specifically around local authority and non-statutory provisions rather than the national organisations. I believe my colleague Hefin David will be picking up specifically on national organisations shortly.

There has been significant support put in in terms of local museums. My officials meet with the local museum sector on a regular basis. At this point, it might be worth me asking one of my officials to give a little bit more detail about the work that has been done there and the additional support that we've put in. I don't know whether Nicky or Jason want to comment on that.

Shall I come in, Chair? Is that okay? Thanks, Chair. I think on that question, similar to what the Minister said on the leisure side, we work really closely with local government around the non-statutory services as well. As the Minister outlined, we have provided additional support for that sector in this budget round. But we keep our ear close to the ground on this, and where we do hear of institutions or smaller organisations that are at risk, we do try our very best to work with the local authority and the relevant governing body, arm's-length body, to try to do everything that we can to sort that. Obviously, the whole sector is nervous at the moment—everybody is, with the cost increases. But, fortunately, so far, we've been able to keep things on a relatively even keel. We've got to watch this space really closely, and we always will do, but so far the support that we've been able to provide has kept these organisations going, which is a good thing. But we've got to keep a close eye on this.

Thank you. If I can move on to Hefin David now for questioning. Thank you.

I'll try to be focused in the question I want to ask first of all on culture and the arts. With regard to the issues that you raised, Deputy Minister, about the various organisations, how is the budget being developed in order to develop towards a cultural strategy, an overall strategy with all of this, and are we likely to see sight of such a thing as a result of the current budget? And how will that take into account the impacts of the pandemic and cost-of-living pressures on culture?

Of course, the cultural strategy is part of the co-operation agreement, and so there is a protected budget around the cultural strategy. The work on that is ongoing. We have now appointed a commission partner to do the engagement work around the cultural strategy for us. We have appointed an oversight board, and all of that work is ongoing.

We haven't yet spent all the money associated with the cultural strategy; we have spent money on the development of the cultural strategy, and I'm setting up the oversight panel and so on, and bringing in the commissioning body to do this work for us. But most of the allocation around the cultural strategy is going to be determined by what the cultural strategy actually produces for us, and what it says our priorities are, and what we need to do. Again, I'm going to look to Nicky to give some updated information on that, because I think we're looking for an initial report in March of this year, from the one-to-one discussions that are going to be going on with our various stakeholders, with a view to that strategy hopefully being developed by the end of 2023. But Nicky, correct me if I'm wrong on that timeline.

No, Minister, that's the timeline that we're working to. As you said, the vast majority of the funding is in 2024-25, when the priorities of the strategy will have been identified. However, we have already allocated an amount of funding to particularly the national cultural bodies to enable them to support delivery and also for their viability as part of that. But the timeline the Minister mentioned is what we're working to.

Thank you very much. Can I ask, Heledd, about the arts council as well?

Yes, please.

The arts council called for an additional £5 million to £10 million specifically to mitigate the impact of the increasing costs across the arts sector. Do you agree with that assessment of the scale of need, and what will be the impact of allocating significantly less, should you not agree with that?

I think at the outset what I would say is that I was very concerned when I saw that report, and saw what the arts council were saying in terms of that potential shortfall that they could see across the sector. Since that report, what I am pleased to say is that we have allocated an additional £1 million in support to the arts sector via the Arts Council of Wales. That was £0.5 million in 2022-23 and another £0.5 million in 2023-24, and that's part of the Welsh Government's wider package of support for the culture and sports sector in Wales.

In addition to that—and I think this is very important—what the Arts Council of Wales have told us is that their National Lottery funding has performed much better than they had expected, and so that means that they're able to direct additional funding to cost-of-living pressures faced by the sector that they hadn't anticipated being able to do previously. So, they're currently exploring options to target that funding in the most effective way that they can. Additionally, £3.8 million has been allocated to the Arts Council of Wales via the support to the culture strategy, which we just referred to, under the co-operation agreement.

I think it's fair to say, though, that due to the budget constraints and the issues that were raised by the Minister at the outset of the session, an ask of £5 million to £10 million from the Welsh Government is not feasible. It's not a feasible level of support that we can put in at this stage. Again, I would reiterate and repeat that the main policy levers to deal with these particular issues, these particular pressures being faced by all of our sectors, are not with the Welsh Government; they are with the UK Gorvenment, and we will continue to press the UK Government to do all it can to try to ensure that these organisations are supported effectively through this most difficult period.

Hefin, do you have any further questions? No, you're happy to move on. If I can bring in Alun Davies.

The Minister's tempting me to go down a little rabbit hole there in terms of funding; I won't be tempted this morning. I'm interested in continuing the conversation we started with the Minister earlier about relative spend across Wales, because one of the lessons that I think we've all learned over the last decade or so is if Cardiff gets a cold, Blaenau Gwent gets pneumonia in terms of spending. Government spending is more important in places that you represent, Deputy Minister, and I represent, because there is less private investment. So, how is the Government looking at protecting the facilities available to people that we both represent in the Heads of the Valleys, where the cost-of-living pressures, the inflation pressures, the austerity pressures are all far, far greater?

Again, I think that is a very fair challenge, and it's something that we have sought to address through the programme for government, and through our remit letters to our cultural and sporting bodies that we're responsible for—

Okay, well, tell me, then, how does the remit letter to Sport Wales reflect the challenge I've just made to you?

Okay, so, the remit letter to Sport Wales talks about improving community facilities, improving health and well-being through physical activity in our most deprived areas. It also talks about equality, inclusion, diversity—all of the things that we know need to be addressed as part of addressing the issue that you raise. All of that—and you've had a copy of the remit letter—

Yes, I've read it.

So, you've had a copy of the remit letter that I sent to Sport Wales, and that is very clear. I will be holding Sport Wales to account on their spend and how they allocate their funding to achieve those objectives, as you will hold me to account as, ultimately, being responsible for that. So, there is a very clear direction not just to Sport Wales, but to all our cultural organisations—that we have to address the issue of inclusion and participation, of equality and diversity in all its forms. I have these conversations with our cultural bodies as well as I do with the sport bodies. So, none of the organisations that I am responsible for can be in any doubt about what our objectives are for this, and the level of spend in those areas I expect to see reflecting our priorities through our programme for government.

What I would say in terms of relative spend, Alun, is if you look at some of the grants that are being made available via Sport Wales—and I'm talking about things like the Be Active grant—the vast majorities of those grants have gone into organisations that operate in areas of significant deprivation, and those are areas like your constituency and mine. I'm absolutely delighted to see that, of the Be Active fund, the biggest amount of grant aid that was provided was actually in Merthyr Tydfil, through the Be Active fund. So, there is a very clear direction—[Laughter.]—about where that money is spent—

It does help having a Minister, doesn't it? You've been very clear there, and what I take, and correct me if I'm wrong, is a very clear directive to all of the bodies you're responsible for from your remit letters that you regard deprivation as an indicator of spend and you would expect to see greater relative spend to address those issues. Correct me if I'm putting words in your mouth, Minister.

But can we move on, as well, to the contemporary art gallery? Now, this is something you and I have discussed in private on a number of occasions. You know that I'm not wholly convinced by the strategy as it currently stands. So, perhaps it would be useful for us, on the record this morning, to understand where you are and how you see the strategy, which I've got misgivings about, progressing, given the current spend envelope.

So, the strategy and the development of the national contemporary art gallery goes right back to about 2018 in fact, so it's been knocking around for some considerable time, but it was a programme for government commitment and it is part of the co-operation agreement that we proceed with a national contemporary art gallery that is based on a dispersed model, and we have partners that are working towards that aim. So, the national library, the national museum and Arts Council of Wales are all working together to deliver this dispersed model of a national contemporary art gallery. We've identified a number of sites across Wales that will be able to house some of these contemporary collections.

The significant change from the original proposal of a dispersed model was that we introduce a number of anchor sites into the game, if you like. So, we don't yet have a final list of potential anchor sites, but we're looking to have a number of anchor sites that will be located in strategic parts of Wales so that all parts of Wales will be able to benefit from the anchor as well as the dispersed model site. Again, I can ask Nicky to give far more information on that.

No, we don't need any—

No, I think we're getting away from budget at the moment.

Yes, the question was how the financial envelope affects the strategy as you've described. We understand what the strategy is and, I think, Chair, it would be useful for us to have a couple of hours on this strategy at some point as a committee.

Yes.

I'm well aware of the issues around that. So, the budget for the contemporary art gallery has not been impacted on by any of the things that we've talked about previously, and the Minister—

So, you expect to stick to the timetable as it already has been set, although changes have been made.

We are hopeful that we will be in a position to be making progress on the national contemporary art gallery by the end of this year—

That's not the question, Minister. 'Being hopeful by the end of this year' isn't the answer I was looking for. The strategy, as it stands, is it affected by the financial climate? You seemed to be edging towards saying 'no'.

No, it's not—

Right, that's all we need to know.

Thank you.

It is not about the finances. So, any potential delays around the national contemporary art gallery are not linked to finances. They're linked to the production of the business case and to practical aspects.

Thank you.

That's all we needed to know.

Thank you. May I ask one question? Just in terms of national organisations, we’ve seen, from the allocations here, that even though there has been perhaps a net increase, the core revenue is consistently less. Given that we know that, for a number of national organisations, such as the national library and so on, a lot of their spending from that revenue funding is on staffing costs. So, have you been able to progress at all in terms of the pay remit of how that will also be supported, because, obviously, we need to ensure fair wages for everybody working in our national institutions. But we've heard very clear indications from both the national library and national museum of Wales, et cetera, that unless the funding was there for the pay remit, that, actually, there will be a decrease in terms of services they're able to provide, which is then, obviously, at odds in terms of the remit letters and being able to do more across Wales.

So, we've signed off the pay remit for all of our arm’s-length bodies, sponsored bodies. All of them have received additional funding from Welsh Government to meet their pay awards for this year. We ensured that they had additional funding from the original allocation so that they were able to make pay offers in line with civil service pay offers, and that has always been our objective—that our arm’s-length bodies be treated no less favourably than directly employed civil service staff. So, that has happened, and all of our sponsored bodies have received additional funding from us to meet those objectives and to meet those requirements of them.

Thank you. Can I bring Tom Giffard in now, please?

Thanks. Deputy Minister, there's a line in the draft budget paper that says,

'Sport can be the nation’s most effective preventative health tool but greater cross-sector prioritisation is needed'.

It's a lovely line, but it was in last year's draft budget as well. That suggests to me it wasn't done last year. Why should this year be any different?

I don't accept that, Tom. I think the fact that it was in last year's and it's in this year's just means that it's still as important as it was last year. And I—

Okay. Well, what progress have we made since last year?

And I would expect it will be in next year's as well.

Okay.

Because it will continue to be very important that sport is the most effective preventative health tool. That won't happen in a year.

So, what progress have you seen since last year on that?

Well, I started to answer this in response to a question from Heledd Fychan earlier on about the amount of cross-departmental work that is going on in this area—in health, through the transformation fund, through our school budgets, through the new curriculum, and how we are introducing sport into the curriculum and making it a core of what we're trying to do, and the fact that we're going to be spending money again through the education budget on community-focused schools so that our facilities will be available in communities and so on. It's through the communities facilities grant—that's the social justice budget head—and local authorities we've talked about. I think it is important to keep saying that the delivery of sport, and all of its objectives, is not solely the responsibility of Welsh Government or my budget. It is a responsibility of a number of public sector bodies, including local authorities and including third sector organisations. And we are funding in a number of those areas, and in a number of Welsh Government departments, and local authorities, to achieve that objective.

So, the preventative aspect of it is still there and it's still very clear. It's still something we have more work to do on. It is still something we're prioritising, and I would expect to see this in next year's budget paper as well, Tom.

Okay. I fully accept what you said about not all of sport would necessarily be something that comes under your portfolio and actually exists in other departments; I accept all of that. What oversight do you have of the ongoing work that might not necessarily sit within your department, and how do you ensure that that meets other sporting goals that you perhaps have and that do sit within your department? How do you ensure that synergy?

Well, we ensure that through Cabinet, because each of us has objectives in Government that we have to deliver. And we are accountable to the Cabinet, to the First Minister, for ensuring that our programme for government commitments are achieved. We all have regular bilateral meetings with the First Minister, where he will talk to us about the progress in our portfolio areas and so on. So, there is regular discussion, there is regular update, there is regular progress with the bodies that each of us as Ministers are responsible for, and across Government with each of the Ministers, so that we talk to each other on that cross-Government basis.

But you understand there's a difference between progress reports at Cabinet and an ongoing assessment to ensure that things that don't sit within your portfolio are meeting the needs that perhaps do exist in your portfolio. That is a very different thing from updates at Cabinet. Do you see that?

Oh, yes, but what I'm saying, Tom, is that that process that I've just referred to is part of the ongoing assessment, because we have to produce the annual report every year on our progress in Government, and what we have achieved and what we've not achieved. And we are answerable to the Senedd if we don't achieve. But there is an ongoing assessment across all portfolio—that we are seeking to achieve everything that is set out in our programme for government, some of which are stand-alone things within portfolios, others of which are cross-departmental.

Thank you, and thank you, Tom. Can we move on to Carolyn Thomas, please? I'm conscious we've got six minutes to go.

Okay. Thank you. Can I just ask why the national botanic garden has had a budget reduction? It's the only institution to have that. I notice that Cadw has had a budget increase, and it was mentioned to me by somebody that Cadw seems to have quite a healthy budget still to spend. Also, really, about the scrutiny of Cadw and Creative Wales, who scrutinises them? So, everything lumped together there.

Yes. Okay, let me start with the national botanic garden. So, I'm quite clear that the national botanic garden has been able to absorb its reduction. They've had a 1.1 per cent reduction, which is the same as everybody else across my portfolio. That amounted to a very modest cut—[Inaudible.]—in pounds to its discretionary grant. I think, you know, we need to be very clear that the National Botanic Garden of Wales is not a Welsh Government sponsored body, so we have different responsibilities and liabilities around all of that, but their capital grant has been maintained at £200,000. They've had an additional £1 million provided to enable them to meet their statutory responsibilities under the—[Inaudible.] In the last financial year, we were also able to provide capital to pay off a long-standing loan that they had to Carmarthenshire council, and that was in excess of £1 million, and we paid that off. We did that on behalf of the national botanic garden, to enable them to move forward on a more sound financial footing, and we've had every indication that that is the case.

In terms of Cadw and Creative Wales, I can assure you that Cadw isn't awash with money. They went through a very—[Inaudible.]

You're cutting out, Minister. Sorry, we've got you back now. Your sound is cutting out a bit, just for you to be aware, but we can follow you.

Okay. You got everything I was saying there about the botanic garden—

Yes.

Yes. I can still hear you.

Okay. On Cadw, then, I was just saying that they're not awash with money, Cadw. Certainly, through the pandemic, they had an extremely difficult time. Most of the Cadw sites were closed and they lost a considerable amount of income, so they are kind of playing catch-up on that at the moment, but we are pleased to see that visitor numbers are returning and that is putting Cadw in a healthier position.

In terms of scrutiny—. Oh, and I should say that Cadw do have a significant capital budget, because we have a significant number of historical monuments that clearly have to be maintained and improved. We've seen significant capital investment in both Caerphilly and Caernarfon castle over the last couple of years. Caernarfon castle is going to be opening formally in March—

Thank you.

Hefin will be aware of what's happening in Caerphilly.

In terms of scrutiny, I think it's important just to say that Cadw and Creative Wales are both internal Welsh Government agencies, but they have independently appointed boards—boards that are independent. So, they oversee and scrutinise the work of Cadw and of Creative Wales, and also of course they are responsible to me and I am subject to scrutiny. So, that's the line of scrutiny.

Thank you, Deputy Minister. Carolyn, do you have a quick question that would warrant a quick response?

No, that's fine. Yes, I saw that there was a reduction in capital from about £1.2 million to £200,000 in the report, so you've explained what that was for the national botanic garden as well, so thank you.

Thank you very much. Can I ask one very quick question, please, Deputy Minister? When we've received evidence from the National Library of Wales, they mentioned that there was a very serious risk to the collections, which they deemed to be totally unacceptable without additional funding. Are you concerned about our national collections at both the national library and National Museum Wales, in light of the budget pressures?

We are working with the national library to get a handle on what all the issues are, but we have put additional support in—again, aware of the impact of increasing costs on the national library. We did put in an additional £650,000 in 2022-23, to help address the increased cost of utilities and cost-of-living pressures, and a further £0.5 million has been given to them to pay for a new fire system, to ensure the safety of their collections.

And in relation to the 2023-24 budget, they will see an increase in their grant in aid funding, and so for the next two financial years, we've made available time-limited and ring-fenced funding to support the additional cost-of-living pressures again. That's £447,000 last year; £678,000 next year; and so on, and similar amounts for dealing with utilities. So, there will be further additional funding to support—[Inaudible.]—priorities, including financial sustainability, over the next two years. We are very well aware of the pressures and the issues facing the national library and we are seeking to address it. I don't know whether Nicky wants to add any more to that, but I'm conscious of time.

Yes. I'm conscious that you have told us that you're not able to stay post 11 a.m., Deputy Minister.

I've got about five minutes. I can give you an extra five minutes.

If we're content, and Minister for Economy, are you content for an additional five minutes? Okay, great. Can we bring in Dr Nicky Guy, then, please?

Yes, thanks, Heledd. So, we're working with both of the organisations to understand their pressures. Obviously, they have been, with their historic estate, hit very, very hard by the inflationary pressures. Specifically around the library, in 2024-25, we have allocated an additional £1.5 million, which is currently sitting in 6170 BEL, towards their collections' storage. That will be transferred over to the library, but it is a ring-fenced grant.

Likewise, there are other capital projects, particularly around decarbonisation and digitisation, which are very much focused on protecting the national library's collection. And they're a key partner within the contemporary art gallery project, so, again, the digitisation of their collection is being taken forward through some funding that's specified for that. So, we are working with them, but there is additional funding specifically for collection storage and collections management, given that the library of course, by its very nature, the size of its collection increases on a daily basis and some of the historic collection needs to be maintained in very, very specific conditions.

Thank you. That's very helpful. And, obviously, that can take funding as well, in terms of the safety of collections. So, it's good to have that reassurance. If I may, perhaps, return to the Deputy Minister, obviously, we haven't been able to cover every element, but we have been able to cover a number of questions. Can I ask, we will have some additional points of clarity, so would both the Minister and the Deputy Minister be happy for us to perhaps ask for some additional clarification? I'm just concerned we haven't really been able to delve into Creative Wales and some of the issues. Would that be possible?

Yes.

Great. Thank you very much. Carolyn.

Sorry. The Deputy Minister said that she has a meeting with Swim Wales, and I'm really concerned because we did hear that, of children in key stage 2, only 50 per cent could swim at the end of that. We heard about transport issues. So, swimming baths are a real concern. So, could we ask for feedback as well from that? That would be really good.

Yes. Would that be okay, Deputy Minister?

Yes, absolutely. I'm happy to provide feedback once I've met with Swim Wales. I'm happy to do that.

Thank you.

Many thanks. Does anybody else on the committee have any questions? Tom, if I may bring you in.

Before we close this part of the meeting, can I just state my dissatisfaction with the connection issues that we've had? I think we've had multiple interruptions throughout, from both the Deputy Minister and the Minister, and I've got misgivings about doing this again virtually. I just wanted to say that for the record.

Thank you. Thank you, Tom, for that. Rather than start on another area and not be able to do it justice, can I thank all our witnesses today? Thank you, Minister and Deputy Minister, and your officials, for joining us. We're very grateful, and for the papers in advance as well. We understand the financial pressures, particularly in terms of non-statutory services, and we would appreciate it if you could please keep us informed as a committee in terms of that wider picture nationally as well. But thank you very much for your time this morning.

Can I say, Chair, that if there are areas that you wanted to cover today that you felt that you haven't, I am more than happy to write to you with further information on any areas that you feel that you haven't been able to cover in committee this morning?

We're very grateful for that. So, thank you very much, all. We will be taking a short break as a committee now and reconvening for our next session at 11:10. So, we'll be going private for five minutes.

Bore da a chroeso nôl i gyfarfod y Pwyllgor Diwylliant, Cyfathrebu, y Gymraeg, Chwaraeon, a Chysylltiadau Rhyngwladol ar gyfer ein sesiwn craffu ni ar gyllideb ddrafft Llywodraeth Cymru ar gyfer 2023-24, ac mae gennym ni sesiwn dystiolaeth gyda Gweinidog y Gymraeg ac Addysg. Gaf i eich croesawu chi, Weinidog, i'r pwyllgor? Bore da i chi. A gaf i ofyn i'ch swyddogion chi i gyflwyno eu hunain ar gyfer y record, os gwelwch yn dda?

Bore da. So, Owain Lloyd—fi yw cyfarwyddwr y Gymraeg ac addysg yn Llywodraeth Cymru.

Bethan Webb, dirprwy gyfarwyddwr 'Cymraeg 2050', Llywodraeth Cymru.

Diolch yn fawr iawn a chroeso i'r tri ohonoch chi atom ni. Os caf i ddechrau os gwelwch yn dda: yn amlwg, mae gennym ni setliad ariannol hynod o heriol am bob math o resymau. Fyddech chi'n gallu amlinellu, os gwelwch yn dda, unrhyw ymarfer o ran blaenoriaethu rydych chi wedi'i gynnal wrth ddatblygu'r gyllideb ddrafft hon?

Wrth gwrs, wel, mae wedi bod yn gyllideb heriol iawn. Byddwch wedi clywed gan Weinidogion eraill hefyd mai efallai y gyllideb anoddaf yng nghyfnod datganoli yw hon oherwydd pwysau chwyddiant a’r ffaith bod y setliad gan San Steffan ddim wedi bod yn ddigonol hyd yn oed i gynnal gwasgiad ar gostau presennol, heb sôn am ehangu cynlluniau, os hoffech chi. Felly, yn y cyd-destun hwnnw, rwy’n credu bod cynnal lefel y gyllideb wedi bod yn ddigon heriol ynddo’i hun heb sôn am gynyddu lefel y gyllideb.

Fel ŷch chi'n gwybod, mae’r gyllideb wedi mynd i fyny eleni a’r bwriad yw y bydd yn cael ei chynyddu eto y flwyddyn ar ôl hynny. Felly, mae hynny'n beth pwysig iawn. Mae enghreifftiau pwysig yn y gyllideb lle rŷn ni wedi gwneud ychwanegion sydd yn mynd i gael impact go iawn, rwy'n credu, er enghraifft, y maes trochi hwyr. Rŷn ni wedi gallu cynyddu’r gyllideb yn fanna—mae hynny’n mynd i gael effaith ar draws Cymru ac ar gael mynediad hafal i addysg Gymraeg. Ac mae yna amryw o lefydd eraill, gan gynnwys meysydd o fewn y cytundeb cydweithio.

Felly, y flaenoriaeth sydd gen i, fel Gweinidog addysg, yw sicrhau ein bod yn gwneud popeth y gallwn ni i gynyddu’r defnydd o’r Gymraeg. Mae cynyddu nifer y siaradwyr wrth gwrs yn bwysig ac yn gwbl ganolog i gyrraedd nod 'Cymraeg 2050', ond fe welwch chi yn y gyllideb fod y rhan fwyaf o'r gyllideb—wel, yr elfen fwyaf o’r gyllideb—yn mynd tuag at gynyddu a chefnogi defnydd pellach. Felly, dyna’r llinell wariant yn y gyllideb sydd â’r fwyaf o gyllideb ac mae hynny’n fwriadol.

Wrth gwrs, mae gennym ni mewn mannau eraill yng nghyllideb Llywodraeth Cymru ffynonellau eraill rŷn ni'n tynnu arnyn nhw i gefnogi maes polisi’r Gymraeg, ond o’m safbwynt i, fel Gweinidog, defnydd yw’r flaenoriaeth.

Diolch, Weinidog. Yn amlwg, rydym ni wedi cael, yn y flwyddyn ddiwethaf yma, y ffigurau o ran y cyfrifiad. Yn amlwg, rydych chi wedi amlinellu’r gwaith pellach sydd ei angen o ran dadansoddi a deall pam mae gwahaniaethau felly. Ond, rydych chi wedi sôn ynglŷn â'r defnydd, yn amlwg, ac rydych chi wedi cyfeirio hefyd at y targed o gynyddu'r niferoedd, felly, ydych chi'n teimlo bod rhai o'r cynlluniau wedi cael eu cyfyngu oherwydd yr heriau ariannol a'r gwasgiadau sydd ar y gyllideb, eich bod chi wedi gorfod ail-flaenoriaethu tuag at y defnydd, neu ydych chi'n parhau efo'r ffocws yna o ran y targed o filiwn o siaradwyr erbyn 2050?

Na, mae'r ffocws, wrth gwrs—dŷn ni ddim yn newid y targed, mae hynny'n sicr. Mae ffigurau'r cyfrifiad yn dangos gostyngiad. Mae hynny, wrth gwrs, fel dwi wedi sôn droeon mewn cyd-destunau eraill, yn destun o siom, ond mae wir yn bwysig gweld y cyd-destun ehangach, a'r ffynonellau eraill yn dangos cynnydd. Felly, mae angen gwaith, fel dwi wedi sôn y tu allan i'r drafodaeth am gyllideb, mae angen cysoni'r data hynny a deall y cyd-destun.

O ran impact y cyfrifiad ar y gyllideb hon, wrth gwrs, rhyw wythnos cyn i'r gyllideb gael ei datgan, cawson ni fynediad at y ffigurau. Dŷn ni ddim yn cael rhagrybudd o'r hyn sy'n cael ei gyhoeddi; rŷn ni'n gweld y ffigurau yr un amser ag y mae'r cyhoedd yn eu gweld nhw. A dyw'r ffigurau i gyd ddim gyda ni, gyda llaw; mae mwy o ddata yn dod y mis hwn, rwy'n credu, neu'r mis nesaf, sydd yn mynd i fod yn rhan bwysig o'n dadansoddiad ni. Felly, byddwn ni'n edrych ar hynny dros y misoedd nesaf. Ac wedyn, rwy'n credu bydd impact y ffigurau hynny'n cael eu teimlo yn y gyllideb nesaf. Ond ar ddiwedd y dydd, y flaenoriaeth hirdymor yw cyrraedd y nod o filiwn o siaradwyr.

Gyda llaw, rôn ni'n sôn yn gynharach am bwysigrwydd defnydd, dyw'r cyfrifiad ddim yn dweud dim byd wrthon ni am ddefnydd, felly mae'n rhaid datgymalu'r ddau beth hynny o ran sut rŷch chi'n strwythuro'r gyllideb. Mae gyda ni ffynonellau eraill sy'n sôn wrthon ni am faint o bobl sy’n defnyddio’r Gymraeg. Mae'r ffigurau yna yn fy nhystiolaeth ysgrifenedig, dwi’n credu. Felly, mae’r ddau beth hynny’n wahanol iawn.

Diolch yn fawr iawn. Dwi’n gwybod y bydd Tom Giffard eisiau mynd ymhellach ar hyn. Mae gennym ni—dim ond i’r rhai sydd yn ymuno’n rhithiol wybod, mae gennym ni ysgol wedi ymuno efo ni'r bore yma y tu cefn ar y funud, felly, croeso i chi i’n pwyllgor ni hefyd. Mae’n braf iawn gweld pobl yn dychwelyd nôl i stad y Senedd hefyd. Os caf i droi at Tom Giffard.

Thank you. Going back to the point that we were talking about a moment ago about the census, you said that you didn't have all that data in as it stands, and obviously, more and more data is coming in all the time. What allowances have you made in that budget, if any, for a change in that data? So, as the picture changes, have you got flexibility to be able to change your priority in terms of where you're spending the money?

Yn ystod y flwyddyn, chi'n meddwl?

Yes.

Wel, mae rhaid edrych ar y data yn ei gyd-destun, felly, dwi ddim yn credu ein bod ni’n mynd i wneud penderfyniadau yn y misoedd nesaf yn sgil hynny. Mae hynny wir yn bwysig, i gofio hynny.

Un o’r pethau a oedd yn benderfyniad yr oedd galw arnaf i i'w wneud fel Gweinidog oedd, os edrychwch chi ar yr holl bethau rŷn ni wedi bod yn eu gwneud dros y flwyddyn ddiwethaf, er enghraifft, mae llawer o’r ymyraethau rheini—gallen ni fod wedi aros i weld beth oedd canlyniadau’r cyfrifiad cyn mynd ati i fuddsoddi yn y pethau hynny. Ond fy marn i oedd, beth bynnag oedd y cyfrifiad yn dangos, p’un ai bod e hyd yn oed yn dangos cynnydd, mae dal angen gwneud y pethau hynny rŷn ni wedi bod yn bwriadu eu gwneud. Felly, byddwch chi’n gweld y patrwm yna yn y cyfnod cyn y cyfrifiad hefyd.

Un peth fydden ni’n dweud, efallai, yw, petasech chi’n gofyn, am y darlun mawr, 'Beth yw un o’r prif takeouts wrth y cyfrifiad?' subject i edrych ar y data yn fanylach, dwi’n credu bod mwy gyda ni i’w wneud yn y maes o fuddsoddi, i sicrhau bod profiad plant a phobl ifanc yn y system addysg cyfrwng Saesneg o ddysgu Cymraeg yn well. Ond, fel mae’n digwydd, mae’r gyllideb honno'n cael ei chynyddu yn y flwyddyn hon, beth bynnag, oherwydd mae angen sicrhau bod ni’n codi sgiliau’r gweithlu er mwyn gallu darparu’n well yn y rhan honno o’r sector. Felly, roedd cynlluniau ar waith eisoes i wneud hynny.

And one of the things that was quite clear, I thought, was that out-of-school Welsh use wasn't the strongest, it probably would be fair to say, so, how does this budget prioritise 'out of a learning setting', if you like, Welsh use?

Ble mae’r data yna’n dod o?

Sori, doedd e ddim yn y census; fy marn i oedd e, ond mae'n glir bod hyn yn broblem.

Wel, mae angen gwneud mwy yn hynny, felly, ond fel rôn i’n dweud yn fras ar y cychwyn, os edrychwch chi ar lle mae’r pwyslais yn y gyllideb, y rhan o’r gyllideb sydd yn cefnogi defnydd yw’r elfen fwyaf yn y gyllideb—rhyw £22 miliwn. Ac mae hynny’n cynnwys lot o bethau yn y cyd-destun rŷch chi’n sôn am, sef defnydd y tu allan i fyd yr ysgol, er enghraifft, mae'n cynnwys cyllideb dysgu Cymraeg i bobl ifanc 18 i 25 nawr, felly mae hynny wedi bod yn ymestyn polisi. Felly dyna'r prif bwyslais, os hoffwch chi, o ran yr elfen fwyaf yn y gyllideb.

Byddwn i hefyd yn dweud, gyda llaw, os edrychwch chi ar yr elfen Cymraeg mewn addysg, rŷn ni wedi sôn yn fras jest nawr am drochi, mae lot o'r gyllideb honno yn cael ei defnyddio i gynyddu capasiti yn y system, i gynyddu mynediad at addysg Gymraeg yn hytrach na thalu am yr addysg ei hunan, i sicrhau bod mynediad hafal gan bobl. Hefyd, os edrychwch chi ar elfen leiaf y gyllideb o dair rhan, sef yr arian sydd yn ariannu'r comisiynydd, mae elfen o hynny hefyd yn gweithio mewn partneriaeth gyda ni yn ffocysu ar hyrwyddo defnydd. Felly, mae elfennau o hynny ym mhob rhan o'r gyllideb.

One final one, you're clearly someone who cares about the Welsh language, and, obviously, education is also in your portfolio, but you'll also understand that, to truly raise the standards of the Welsh language, it needs to be a cross-Government priority across a number of portfolio areas. How are you ensuring that, not only yourself, but all the other Ministers and all of the other departments are treating Welsh with exactly the same passion and energy that you would?

Diolch am hynny. O ran atebolrwydd, fi sydd yma heddiw yn ateb y cwestiynau, ond gall dim un Gweinidog y Gymraeg lwyddo i wneud y lefel o gynnydd sydd angen heb fod gyda chi gydweithredu ar draws y Llywodraeth yn gyfan gwbl. Beth sydd wedi bod yn digwydd dros y misoedd diwethaf yw mae'r Cabinet nawr yn cael trafodaeth ar bolisi Cymraeg a sut mae hynny'n cael ei brif-ffrydio drwy feysydd polisi yn gyffredinol bob tymor, ac, yn sgil un o'r cyfarfodydd hynny, wedi bod yn cael cyfres llwyddiannus o gyfarfodydd gyda phob un Gweinidog arall yn edrych ar eu profiad nhw o'r Gymraeg eu hunain, gyda llaw, ond hefyd beth mwy gallwn ni ei wneud i gydweithio rhwng fy adran i a'u hadrannau nhw i brif-ffrydio'r Gymraeg, nid fel elfen o tick box pan fo cyngor yn dod i ddweud, 'Ydyn, rŷn ni wedi ystyried hyn', ond ein bod ni wir yn mynd i'r afael gyda'r impact ar y Gymraeg o benderfyniadau—rhai yn bositif, rhai yn negyddol—o bob penderfyniad polisi. Felly, mae'r drafodaeth honno yn digwydd; mae wedi bod yn digwydd ers sbel, ond rwy'n teimlo bod hynny'n digwydd efallai gyda mwy o ffocws nawr.

Os edrychwch chi ar draws y gyllideb yn gyffredinol, rŷch chi wedi cael tystiolaeth y bore yma wrth Weinidog yr Economi a'r Gweinidog diwylliant. Mae amryw o'r pethau maen nhw'n buddsoddi ynddyn nhw'n cael effaith ar y Gymraeg—y llyfrgell genedlaethol, y cyngor llyfrau, yn y maes iechyd, yn y maes newid hinsawdd—mae buddsoddiad ym mhob un o'r meysydd hynny yn cael effaith ar y Gymraeg.

Dau beth y byddwn i'n dweud os caf i, jest i roi nodyn o gyd-destun ichi, mae gyda chi ddewis, os hoffwch chi, neu ryw fath o densiwn, efallai, ar un lefel. Os ŷch chi'n sôn am ariannu'r Gymraeg yn benodol, fel rhaglen benodol i ariannu'r Gymraeg, mae ychydig o risg yn ddiwylliannol bod pobl wedyn yn meddwl, 'Wel, dyna'r bit sy'n delio â'r Gymraeg'. Felly, mae'n rhaid cadw cydbwysedd fanna. Mae'n rhaid gwneud y ddau.

Yr elfen arall, byddwn i'n dweud, yw wrth eich bod chi'n edrych ar y gyllideb, rŷn ni eisiau gweld beth yw impact y gyllideb ar y cyfan ar y Gymraeg. Bydd elfennau'n bositif a bydd rhai efallai ddim mor bositif; mae hynny'n naturiol. Mae gwaith yn digwydd ar hyn o bryd i wella dealltwriaeth o'r impact ar y Gymraeg o fewn meysydd polisi a phan fydd hynny wedi symud ymlaen, rwyf i'n credu y bydd darlun cliriach gyda ni ar draws y gyllideb i gyd o'r net effect, os hoffwch chi.

Diolch.

Diolch. Gaf i ofyn ichi, Weinidog, mi glywson ni dystiolaeth y bore yma o ran yr elfennau diwylliannol a chwaraeon yn benodol, rydych chi'n sôn ynglŷn â'r pwyslais o ran eich cyllideb chi o ran defnydd ac ati, oes gennych chi bryder—? Un o'r pethau a oedd yn dod allan o'r dystiolaeth oedd, yn amlwg, awdurdodau lleol a gwasanaethau sydd ddim yn statudol, felly, sy'n gallu chwarae rhan ganolog o ran y cynlluniau strategol y Gymraeg mewn addysg hefyd, yn enwedig o ran defnydd y tu hwnt i'r dosbarth, os ydyn ni'n meddwl am chwaraeon drwy gyfrwng y Gymraeg, ac ati? Oes gennych chi bryder, oherwydd y toriadau rydyn ni'n eu gweld efo awdurdodau lleol, bod hynna, efallai, yn mynd i effeithio o ran defnydd? Neu, ydy hynna'n rhan o'ch meddwl chi o ran y pwyslais efo'r defnydd, oherwydd efallai bod yna risg i rai o'r gwasanaethau sydd ddim yn statudol ond sydd yn amlwg yn allweddol bwysig o ran y defnydd?

Wel, mae hwnna'n gwestiwn teg iawn. Wrth gwrs, mae pwysau ar gynghorau lleol ac, wrth gwrs, mae pethau anstatudol wastad yn fwy bregus yn y cyd-destun hwnnw; mae hynny'n rhywbeth rydyn ni'n deall. Byddwn i'n dweud, os edrychwch chi ar lle rŷn ni'n defnyddio'n grantiau, mae hynny'n cael—. Er enghraifft, un o'r cyrff mae awdurdodau lleol yn gallu cydweithio â nhw er mwyn sicrhau bod y gwaith da maen nhw'n ei wneud yn y cynlluniau strategol hefyd yn cael impact yn y gymuned yw perthynas gyda'r Urdd, er enghraifft, sy'n gwneud gwaith ffantastig o ran gweithgaredd Cymraeg diwylliannol, ond hefyd ym maes chwaraeon—roeddech chi'n sôn am hynny—a'r maes prentisiaethau, felly, amryw o bethau. Felly, mae'r arian rŷn ni'n dyrannu iddyn nhw yn fwriadol, felly, er mwyn cynyddu capasiti'r Urdd i gydweithio gyda chyrff eraill. Dyna pam mae'r cynllun grant mor bwysig, fel ein bod ni'n gallu ariannu'r cyrff yma yn uniongyrchol, os hoffwch chi, fel eu bod nhw'n gallu cydweithio, wedyn, â chynghorau. Ond, mae'r risg rŷch chi'n sôn amdano fe yn un real, yn sicr.

Diolch, Weinidog. Os gaf i ofyn efallai'n benodol o ran Mudiad Meithrin, ydych chi'n credu bod y cyllid a ddarperir iddyn nhw i ehangu a datblygu capasiti blynyddoedd cynnar cyfrwng Cymraeg yn cael effaith ddigonol o ran argaeledd a mynediad ledled Cymru?

Mae beth bynnag yw'r gair Cymraeg am 'rolling programme' gyda nhw. Felly, wrth gwrs, dyw'r gwaith i gyd ddim wedi'i wneud. Felly, wrth gwrs, bydd rhannau o Gymru lle does dim darpariaeth ddigonol ar hyn o bryd. Ond, mae'r cynllun sydd gan Mudiad Meithrin i gynyddu'r lefel o ddarpariaeth ar darged—a dweud y gwir, mae tu hwnt i'r targed mewn rhai mannau. Y cynllun yw, dros tymor y Senedd hon, i agor 60 setting newydd, ynghyd â'r 43 agorwyd yn y cyfnod cyntaf o dair mlynedd. Felly, maen nhw ar drac ar gyfer hynny. Mae hynny'n rhyw fath o run rate blynyddol o 12 setting newydd, ond ar fwy nag un flwyddyn, maen nhw wedi cynyddu yn gyflymach na hynny. Felly, maen nhw ar drac i wneud hynny, felly dwi'n ffyddiog bod y ddarpariaeth yn mynd i ddod. Wrth gwrs, mae'n cymryd amser i agor, ac un o'r heriau sydd yn constraint ar hynny, wrth gwrs, yw gweithlu. Felly, rŷn ni'n buddsoddi hefyd o ran cefnogi'r Mudiad gydag annog pobl i ddod i mewn i'r sector, ond hefyd i gael cymwysterau trwy gyfrwng y Gymraeg.

Ac mae'r buddsoddiad hwnnw wedi gallu cael ei ddiogelu, felly, yn y gyllideb ddrafft.

Ydy.

Diolch yn fawr iawn. Gaf i symud ymlaen at Alun Davies, os gwelwch yn dda?

Diolch. Dwi eisiau parhau gyda'r sgwrs ynglŷn ag addysg. Dwi'n licio'r ffordd dŷch chi'n siarad, Weinidog, a'r tôn dŷch chi'n defnyddio, a dwi'n hoff iawn o ambell i beth dŷch chi wedi'i ddweud o ran sut dŷch chi'n gweld y Gymraeg yn ffynnu ac yn datblygu yn y dyfodol. Un o'r pethau dwi eisiau gweld, a dwi'n credu ein bod ni i gyd eisiau gweld, yw mwy o gyfle i blant gael eu haddysg drwy gyfrwng y Gymraeg—dim jest dysgu, ond addysg drwy gyfrwng y Gymraeg. Yn y cyd-destun ariannol presennol, beth dwi'n clywed gan gynghorau yw bod yna ddigon o arian ychwanegol yn dod o Lywodraeth Cymru i greu ysgol Gymraeg newydd, ond does dim digon yn y gyllideb i barhau i ariannu rhai o'r ysgolion Cymraeg lle mae ysgolion newydd yn cael eu hagor. Sut fyddech chi'n ymateb i hynny?

Un o'r heriau wrth agor ysgol Gymraeg newydd yw eich bod chi, mewn rhai cymunedau, yn mynd yn gyflymach na'r galw. Dyna beth rŷn ni eisiau'i wneud; rŷn ni eisiau helpu i greu'r galw. Mae risg refeniw yn dod yn sgil hynny, onid oes? Beth rŷch chi'n gweld, efallai, yw penderfyniadau i ddatblygu ysgolion, ond efallai y gallech chi ddatblygu rhai yn fwy petasech chi'n gallu cymryd fwy o risg ar y refeniw. Ryn ni wedi gallu dod i gytundeb ar elfennau o hynny gydag awdurdodau. Fe wnaf i ofyn, efallai, i Owain ddweud ychydig mwy am sut ryn ni'n gwneud hynny. Ond, mewn rhannau o Gymru—mae hyn yn digwydd yn y gogledd mewn rhai cymunedau—rŷn ni wedi gallu cydweithio gydag awdurdodau i geisio datrys rhai o'r heriau hynny. Wyt ti eisiau ychwanegu at hynny?

Ie. Yn sicr, mae'n rhan bwysig o'r trafodaethau mae'r Gweinidog yn eu cael ar lefel gweinidogol, a hefyd dŷn ni'n eu cael fel swyddogion gydag awdurdodau lleol o ran eu cynlluniau CSCAau nhw. Dyw hwnna ddim jest yn bwysig o ran trafod y cyfalaf ond hefyd y refeniw ac edrych ar sut maen nhw'n cynllunio nid jest yr ysgolion Cymraeg ond hefyd o ran yr ysgolion Saesneg yn yr ardal yn rhan bwysig o hynny. So, dŷn ni'n gwybod, mewn rhai mannau o Gymru dros y blynyddoedd nesaf, fod yna gwymp yn mynd i fod o ran niferoedd disgyblion. Felly, mae'n hollol hanfodol bod awdurdodau lleol yn meddwl am hynny ac yn cynllunio ymlaen llaw—

Ond ydych chi'n gweld cyfrifoldeb ar Lywodraeth Cymru i helpu awdurdodau lle mae yna broblemau, neu ble mae'n anodd yn ariannol—nid jest y cyfalaf i ariannu adeiladu ysgol newydd Gymraeg, ond wedyn, fel dŷch chi'n dweud, Mr Lloyd, yr arian refeniw yn y dyfodol?

Wel, does dim pot refeniw penodol ar gyfer hynny o beth. Fel rŷch chi'n gwybod, mae'n—

Ie, a dyna'r pwynt dwi'n ei wneud.

Mae'n dod trwy'r RSG fel rhan o setliad llywodraeth leol. So—

So, does dim elfen ychwanegol i ddatblygu addysg Gymraeg, nac oes?

Nac oes, ond mae'n gorfod bod yn rhan hanfodol o'u cynlluniau—

So, mae'n fater i'r awdurdodau lleol.

Ac yn rhan o'u cynllunio nhw ar gyfer addysg yn gyffredinol.

A fy mhwynt i yw does dim bwriad gan y Llywodraeth i gynnig unrhyw gymorth ychwanegol i awdurdodau yn ystod y blynyddoedd nesaf.

Wel, o ran refeniw, mae hynny'n cael ei setlo trwy'r RSG; dyna'r cynllun. Ond wrth gwrs, wrth edrych ar y cynlluniau strategol, mae'r trafodaethau yma i gyd ynghlwm yn y cwestiwn o faint o ddarpariaeth gallwch chi ei gwneud dros y cyfnod nesaf. Rŷn ni'n bwriadu agor 23 ysgol gynradd newydd, er enghraifft. Ond un o'r pethau sydd yn bwysig ei gadw mewn cof, rwy'n credu, fan hyn hefyd yw dŷn ni ddim yn mynd i allu cyrraedd y nod jest trwy agor ysgolion cyfrwng Cymraeg newydd; mae symud ysgolion ar hyd y continwwm ieithyddol yn wir yn bwysig.

Cytuno, cytuno. Roeddwn i'n gofyn cwestiwn penodol—

Dwi'n gwybod, ond yr ateb—. Beth rwy'n dweud yw ei fod e'n rhan o'r darlun.

Ocê.

Dwi'n gwybod bod Carolyn eisiau dod mewn yn sydyn ar hyn.

Yes, just regarding the development of Welsh-medium schools, Welsh-medium education, I understand there is a shortage of Welsh language teachers already. Have you any thoughts of incentives or bursaries for people who might be going into teaching to go into Welsh-medium education, or do that little bit of extra work to be confident in studying in Welsh—an incentive like we do have for nurses, nursing bursaries? Thank you.

Mae gyda ni'r cynllun Iaith Athrawn Yfory, sy'n darparu cymhellion ariannol i bobl i ddod mewn i'r sector, ond mae'r Coleg Cymraeg Cenedlaethol yn peilota bursary hefyd. A hefyd, fel rŷch chi'n dweud, mae wir yn bwysig ffeindio ffyrdd o ddenu pobl mewn. Mae elfen o honno yn ariannol, ond mae elfennau eraill ynghlwm yn hynny. Mae gyda ni gynllun 10 mlynedd i gydweithio â phartneriaid ar draws Cymru i sicrhau ein bod ni'n gallu edrych ar ffyrdd amgen i gymhwyso fel athro, neu hefyd edrych ar le, efallai, byddai pobl y gallen ni eu denu mewn i'r proffesiwn. Felly, mae'r Coleg Cymraeg Cenedlaethol hefyd yn gweithio ar greu rhwydwaith o fyfyrwyr sydd wedi symud o Gymru i ddysgu, i astudio, yn Lloegr ond sy'n medru'r Gymraeg, a chadw cysylltiad gyda nhw a'u denu nhw nôl, er enghraifft. Felly, mae angen bod yn greadigol iawn, rwy'n credu, yn sut rŷn ni'n mynd i'r afael â hyn.

Diolch. Os caf i fynd nôl at Alun Davies.

Ocê. Un o'r—. Gwnes i ddechrau fy nghwestiynau y bore yma trwy ddweud fy mod i'n hoff iawn o'r tôn rydych chi'n ei defnyddio, Gweinidog, ac un o'r pethau dwi'n licio yw'r bwyslais ar ddefnydd o'r Gymraeg. Dwi'n credu bod cytundeb bod angen inni weld mwy o ddefnydd o'r Gymraeg. Ond trwy chwyddiant, mae'r gyllideb wedi'i thorri'n sylweddol yn ystod y flwyddyn yma, blwyddyn nesaf. Felly, pa impact ydych chi'n rhagweld ar ddefnydd o'r Gymraeg os yw'r sefydliadau, y mudiadau sy'n trio hybu defnydd o'r Gymraeg yn gweld toriadau mewn termau real yn eu cyllideb?

Wel, mae hynny'n issue, wrth gwrs. Felly, mae rhai o'r partneriaid rŷn ni'n eu hariannu wedi cael cyllideb fflat dros gyfnod yn ddiweddar, ac mae hynny wrth gwrs am wasgedd ariannol, ac wrth gwrs mae hynny'n eu galluogi nhw i wario llai ar yr initiatives maen nhw'n eu gwneud. Beth rŷn ni wedi'i wneud hefyd, er enghraifft—rŷn ni'n adolygu'r cynllun grant yn gyffredinol ar hyn o bryd i weld os yw e'n gyson gydag amcanion 'Cymraeg 2050'. Mae hynny'n rhannol yn ymwneud â faint o arian mae'r cyrff yn ei gael, ond hefyd dros ba gyfnod, fel ein bod ni'n gallu creu, o fewn y cyd-destun o wasgedd, fel oeddech chi'n sôn amdano fe, mwy o hyblygrwydd gyda nhw yn sut i ddefnyddio'r arian yna, fod gyda nhw gyfle i weld grantiau mwy hirdymor fel eu bod nhw'n gallu cynllunio yn well, fel bod hynny'n rhoi cyfle iddyn nhw i liniaru rhywfaint ar y pwysau ariannol.

Rŷn ni hefyd, er enghraifft, gyda'r mentrau iaith, wedi bod yn pwysleisio'r flaenoriaeth o ymrymuso cymunedol—hynny yw, nid jest darparu eu hunain, ond cydweithio â mudiadau eraill. Felly, un o'r pethau rŷn ni wedi gallu ei wneud, er bod y gyllideb wedi bod yn fflat i rai o'r cyrff hynny, yw creu cronfa newydd gyda'r corff Cwmpas, sydd yn creu mentrau cydweithredol, ac rŷn ni wedi gweithio gyda rhai o'r mentrau iaith i greu mentrau cydweithredol tu fewn i'r fframwaith hwnnw—rhyw bedair o'r rheini. Felly, cydweithio, partneriaeth, yw lot ohono fe, o gofio'r cyd-destun rŷch chi'n sôn amdano fe.

Iawn. Dyw partneriaeth ddim yn helpu i dalu'r biliau trydan.

Nac yw, ond mae'r gronfa arian, ac rŷn ni wedi darparu cronfeydd newydd hefyd.

Ocê. So, sut ydych chi'n rhagweld hynny yn cael impact ar y mudiadau a'r sefydliadau rŷn ni'n eu trafod, pan ydyn nhw'n gweld arian craidd yn cael ei golli oherwydd chwyddiant? Sut ydych chi'n gweld y gronfa newydd yma yn cynnig cymorth iddyn nhw?

Wel, mae'r gronfa yn cael ei rhedeg gan Cwmpas, sef y corff cydweithredol yng Nghymru, a beth rŷn ni'n ei argymell, yn cydweithio â'r mentrau, yw—

Dyna beth dwi ddim cweit yn ei ddeall. Rwy'n croesawu fe, gyda llaw. Does gen i ddim problem gyda fe, ond dwi ddim yn siŵr fy mod i'n deall sut mae'r gronfa yma yn mynd i helpu'r sefydliadau sydd wedi gweld cwymp yn eu harian rheolaidd nhw.

Ocê. Ti eisiau dod mewn ar yr elfen manylder?

Mae'r Urdd wedi derbyn £1.2 miliwn yn ychwanegol yn y tymor yma, ac hefyd rydyn ni'n ariannu'r Eisteddfod Genedlaethol hyd at £1 miliwn. Rydyn ni hefyd wedi ymrwymo i edrych ar gyllideb y mentrau iaith, fel mae'r Gweinidog wedi ei ddweud, yn sgil yr arolwg grant. Ond, fel man cychwyn, oherwydd ein bod ni'n gwybod bod y costau ariannol yn pwyso, rydyn ni wedi ymrwymo i edrych yn yr wythnosau nesaf ar hynny hefyd cyn inni gael argymhellion yr adroddiad ar y grant yn ei gyfanrwydd.

Ocê. Wel, dwi'n gwerthfawrogi hynny, Mrs Webb, ond dwi ddim cweit yn siŵr ei fod e'n ateb y cwestiwn gofynnais i. I chi, Weinidog, ydych chi'n bwriadu ymyrryd mewn unrhyw ffordd? Achos, ar hyn o bryd, o beth dwi'n ei weld, mae grantiau yn cael eu cynnig a'r stwff yma i fentrau iaith i wneud beth bynnag maen nhw'n dewis ei gwneud yn eu cymuned. Ydych chi'n bwriadu ymyrryd mewn unrhyw ffordd i ddweud wrth rhai sefydliadau, 'Dyma lle mae fy mlaenoriaeth i, dyma beth dwi eisiau chi ddefnyddio arian trethdalwyr i'w wneud'?

Rwy'n gwneud hynny eisoes. Yn sgil y gwaith a wnaethpwyd yn ystod COVID i weld beth oedd impact ariannol COVID ar rai o'r cyrff hyrwyddo, gwnes i ofyn i'r cyrff hynny ailffocysu ar nid jest darparu gweithgareddau eu hunain, ond y syniad yma o greu capasiti a grymuso cymdeithasol. Ac mae hynny'n sifft mawr yn y ffordd mae nifer o'r cyrff—dim i gyd; mae arfer da eisoes yn y rhan honno o'r sector—. Os edrychwch chi ym Môn, er enghraifft, mae lot o waith cymunedol yn yr economi leol hefyd. Felly, mae hynny'n elfen, ac maen nhw i gyd nawr yn ailffocysu ar hynny. Dyna pam mae'r gronfa gyda Cwmpas yn bwysig, achos mae hynny yn caniatau iddyn nhw i gydweithio ar yr initiatives hynny, a dyna beth yw pwrpas yr adolygiad grant—i weld os ydyw e'n gyson â'r hyn rŷn ni'n ofyn o'r cyrff yma ar gyfer 2050.

Dwi'n gwerthfawrogi hynny, a dwi'n croesawu hynny hefyd. Roedd Tom Giffard wedi gofyn cwestiwn i chi amboutu sut roedd yr holl gysyniad tu ôl i'r darged o filiwn i newid y ffordd mae'r Llywodraeth yn gweithredu. Doedd e ddim yn darged i is-adran y Gymraeg; roedd e'n darged i Lywodraeth Cymru.

Wrth gwrs.

Rydych chi wedi dweud, wrth ateb Tom, fod cyllideb, fel petai, y Gymraeg yn gyllideb Llywodraeth Cymru mewn ffordd, achos mae yna sawl elfen. Ydych chi wedi—? Neu oes yna unrhyw baseline, os ydych chi'n lecio, ar gyfer gwariant Llywodraeth Cymru ar y Gymraeg ar draws y Llywodraeth?

Nac oes. Dyna beth rôn i, mwy neu lai, yn trio ei ddweud yn gynharach—dyw e ddim mor glir â hynny. A dyna’r tensiwn sydd gyda ni, os caf i jest dweud ychydig yn helaethach: beth yw gwariant ar y Gymraeg? Felly, os edrychwch chi ar gyllideb y gwaith dŷn ni wedi ei wneud gydag Arfor—roedd Gweinidog yr Economi gyda chi'n gynharach—ai Arfor yw'r elfen o wariant yn y gyllideb honno ar y Gymraeg, ai Busnes Cymru? Ond, actually, beth ddylem ni fod yn ceisio ei ddangos yw impact yr holl raglenni economaidd ar y Gymraeg. Felly, mae e'n llawer mwy cymhleth na jest dweud, a fyddwn i ddim moyn creu fformiwla sy'n dweud, 'Dŷn ni jest yn mynd i werthuso'—er enghraifft—'Arfor', achos mae hynny'n mynd i greu'r ymddygiad anghywir yn y Llywodraeth, rwy'n credu.

Cadeirydd, dwi yn meddwl bod hyn yn fater i'w drafod â'r Llywodraeth. Achos dwi'n tueddu i gytuno â'r Gweinidog ei bod hi'n anodd iawn mesur gwariant, ond mae'n bwysig iawn trio mesur impact. A dwi'n croesawu'r penodiadau dŷch chi wedi eu gwneud yn ddiweddar; mae Dr Brooks wedi dechrau'r gwaith, ac eraill, wrth edrych ar gymunedau Cymraeg. Ac felly, dwi yn meddwl y byddai hi'n hwylus pe baem ni'n gallu, trwy efallai broses y gyllideb, drio edrych ar impact polisïau Llywodraeth Cymru ar y Gymraeg. Ac efallai y byddai hi'n hwylus pe bai'r Gweinidog yn gallu ysgrifennu atom ni i ddechrau'r sgwrs honno.

Yn sicr, hapus iawn i wneud hynny. Fel rôn i'n ei ddweud, dŷn ni ar y llwybr nawr o symud—. Mae gyda ni impact integredig ar gyfer y gyllideb, ond fel ein bod ni'n gallu cael y darlun clir i chi, ac dwi'n moyn, mae angen inni wella'r ddealltwriaeth o impact polisïau unigol, fel ein bod ni'n gallu edrych ar yr aggregate wedyn yn y gyllideb, a dyna'r gwaith sydd ar waith. Felly, byddwn i'n hapus iawn, Gadeirydd, i ysgrifennu am hynny.

Diolch yn fawr iawn.

Dwi'n hapus â hynny.

Diolch. Gaf i fynd nôl, jest o ran athrawon—y pwynt o ran diffyg athrawon, a'n bod ni'n dal, o ran y cyfrwng Saesneg yn benodol, i fod yn ymwybodol mewn rhai ardaloedd dyw efallai lefel A Cymraeg ddim yn gallu cael ei gynnig mewn rhai ysgolion oherwydd bod y galw'n isel, neu'r diffyg gallu recriwtio staff o fewn ysgolion cyfrwng Saesneg ac yn ddaearyddol yn golgyu nad yw hi felly'n ymarferol hyd yn oed i rywun deithio ymhell? Oes yna gefnogaeth ar gael o ran cefnogi ysgolion cyfrwng Saesneg o ran—? Oherwydd yn aml beth dwi wedi ei gael yn ôl gan ysgolion ydy efallai nad ydy hi'n cost-effective, o ran dim digon o ddisgyblion ac ati. Sut felly ydych chi'n meddwl bod yr ymyriadau rydych chi'n eu gwneud yn mynd i sicrhau, hyd yn oed os ydy o'n ddau ddisgybl mewn ysgol cyfrwng Saesneg a fyddai'n dymuno gwneud lefel A Cymraeg, sut maen nhw felly'n cael y cyfle hwnnw—bod y sefyllfa economaidd, felly, ddim yn rhwystr, os ydym ni o ddifrif ynglŷn â symud ysgolion cyfrwng Saesneg o ran y continwwm a rhoi cyfle i bob disgybl, dim ots pa ysgol y maen nhw ynddi, i allu mynd ymlaen efo'r continwwm iaith?

Yn y BEL Cymraeg mewn addysg, os edrychwch chi ar yr elfen e-sgol, mae cyllideb yn hynny sy'n cefnogi i hynny ddigwydd ar lefel cydweithio rhwng ysgolion. Felly, y llynedd, fe wnaethom ni fwy neu lai ddyblu'r gyllideb honno—o nghof—a dŷn ni wedi ei gynnal e yn y gyllideb hon eleni. Felly, mae hynny yn caniatáu cydweithio rhwng ysgolion, fel dyw'r niferoedd ddim yn her. Mae e wedi bod yn cael ei beilota yng Ngheredigion, ac mae e nawr ar gael ym mhob rhan o Gymru. Mae heriau gwahanol—rhai'n ddaearyddol, rhai am resymau eraill—mewn gwahanol ysgolion. A bues i yn ddiweddar i weld sut mae e'n gweithio ar lawr gwlad yng Ngheredigion mewn ysgol, ac roedd e'n ddiddorol iawn i weld sut roedd e'n gweithio. Roedd gyda chi athro mewn un ystafell, a dosbarthiadau gwahanol yn gweithio ar y sgrin gyda'i gilydd. Ac fe wnes i drafod y manteision gyda'r athro, ond hefyd gyda'r disgyblion, ac roedd e'n ddiddorol iawn. Mae pethau i'w dysgu yn y math yna o decheg y gallem ni ei ddefnyddio'n llawer ehangach yn ein system addysg ni, a dweud y gwir. Felly, os y cewch chi gyfle i fynd i weld hynny ar waith, fel pwyllgor, mae e'n werth ei weld, yn sicr.

Gwych. Diolch yn fawr iawn. Gaf i ofyn a allwch chi ehangu ar gyllid a ddyrannwyd i'r Eisteddfod Genedlaethol yn benodol yn y gyllideb ddrafft, a'r hyn roeddech chi'n cyfeirio ato fo, fod cyllid ar gyfer yr Eisteddfod Genedlaethol yn bwriadu cael ei gynyddu i £1 miliwn yn 2023-24? Yn amlwg, mi glywsom ni dystiolaeth gan yr Eisteddfod Genedlaethol o ran yr heriau mawr y maen nhw wedi eu hwynebu oherwydd y cynnydd mewn costau, nid yn unig yn sgil yr argyfwng costau byw ac ati, ond hefyd yn dilyn Brexit ac ati, o ran rhai pethau. Allwch chi egluro pa drafodaethau sydd wedi bod o ran cyllid efo'r Eisteddfod Genedlaethol, a sut mae'r arian yma yn bwriadu bod o gefnogaeth o ran dyfodol yr Eisteddfod Genedlaethol?

Wel, mae'n mynd at gynaliadwyedd y sefydliad, onid yw e, fel ein bod ni'n gallu cefnogi'r sefydliad i wneud yr hyn ŷn ni eisiau iddyn nhw ei wneud. Mae'n mynd nôl, a dweud y gwir, i'r drafodaeth am ddyblu defnydd; rwy'n credu bod gan yr Eisteddfod Genedlaethol rôl bwysig iawn yn ein helpu ni i gyrraedd y nod honno. Ac mae'n hanfodol bwysig, byddwn i'n dweud, ar gyfer llwyddiant 'Cymraeg 2050' yn ehangach na hynny hefyd.

Mae gennych chi'r ŵyl ei hun, ond mae gennych chi hefyd ystod eang o weithgareddau cymunedol sydd yn digwydd fel halo o amgylch yr ŵyl, pan fo'n teithio o amgylch Cymru. Ac mae hynny'n caniatáu i bobl efallai sydd ddim yn hyderus yn y Gymraeg, sy'n dod i'r Gymraeg am y tro cyntaf, ynghyd â'r rheini efallai sydd yn hyderus ond ddim â'r cyfle bydden nhw eisiau ei weld, mae cyfle wedyn, wrth ein bod ni'n cefnogi'r Eisteddfod Genedlaethol ymhellach, i wneud mwy yn y meysydd hynny. A dyna beth yw bwriad peth o'r gyllideb, eu bod nhw'n staffio er mwyn gallu darparu'r gweithgaredd cymdeithasol Cymraeg hynny tu allan, o amgylch yr Eisteddfod. Bydd hynny'n digwydd yn barod yn eich rhan chi o Gymru, yn Rhondda Cynon Taf, a wedyn bydd e'n dechau maes o law yn Wrecsam ar gyfer y flwyddyn ar ôl hynny, ac mae hynny'n creu cyfleoedd i ddefnyddio'r Gymraeg, ac mae hynny mor bwysig.

Felly, dim ond o ran yr elfen yma o'r gyllideb felly, yn amlwg mae yna gyfeiriad o ran sicrhau staffio yr Eisteddfod ac ati. Rydyn ni'n gwybod eu bod nhw wedi gorfod colli rhai staff oherwydd yr heriau efo COVID ac ati. Ydych chi'n gweld, o ran y pwyslais rydych chi'n ei roi o ran defnydd, fod buddsoddi yn yr Eisteddfod Genedlaethol, felly, yn rhan o'r gefnogaeth honno, yn rhywbeth rydych chi'n ceisio ei flaenoriaethu?

Yn sicr.

Diolch yn fawr iawn; ateb cryno a chlir iawn. Gawn ni symud ymlaen, os gwelwch yn dda, at Carolyn Thomas?

Just regarding the Welsh Language Commissioner's budget, do you think that—[Inaudible.] And I saw that there is—. Sorry. Shall I repeat that, because it wasn't on the mike? Okay. So, it's just regarding the Welsh Language Commissioner's budget, and you have a new Welsh commissioner. Do you believe that the budget is enough for them to be able to carry out their duty? I see that there is an uplift, but I believe that's to cover wage increases in that department, to keep them in line with pay awards.

Ie, mae cynnydd o 4 y cant wedi bod, sydd yn gyson â'r cynnydd i'r comisiynwyr eraill, ac fel ŷch chi'n dweud, pwrpas hynny yw sicrhau cyflogau staff. Mae hefyd dyraniad o ran cyfalaf, wrth gwrs, ar gyfer technoleg gwybodaeth yn y rhan fwyaf. Rwyf yn hyderus bod y gyllideb yn caniatáu’r comisiynydd i wneud ei gwaith. Ges i gyfle yr wythnos hon i gwrdd â'r comisiynydd newydd, sydd wedi bod yn ei rôl ers wythnos. Roedd y ddau ohonon ni'n keen i gael cyfarfod cynnar. Roedd e'n gyfarfod buddiol iawn a phositif iawn. Mae'r drafodaeth y bore yma wedi bod lot ynghylch defnydd a chynyddu defnydd y Gymraeg, a'r hyn ddywedwn i o'r sgwrs a gawsom ni gydag Efa Gruffudd Jones oedd bod pwyslais y comisiynydd newydd hefyd yn glir iawn ar gynyddu defnydd. Felly, rwy'n credu bod hynny i'w groesawu, felly rwy'n edrych ymlaen at gydweithio â hi yn y swydd newydd.

Diolch yn fawr iawn. Oes yna unrhyw gwestiynau? Ie.

Allaf i ofyn am y comisiynydd? Er ei bod hi'n newydd yn y rôl—a dwi'n edrych ymlaen at weld beth mae'n gallu gwneud yn y rôl—fe fydd ganddi hi flaenoriaethau gwahanol i'r un cyn hynny, felly sut ydych chi'n gwybod bod y budget ŷch chi wedi ei rhoi iddi yn ddigon i wneud y blaenoriaethau fydd efallai yn wahanol i'r un cyn hynny?

Wel, fel pob corff, mae'n rhaid ichi weithio ar eich blaenoriaethau o fewn y gyllideb sydd gennych chi.

Ond cwestiwn Carolyn oedd: ydy e'n ddigon iddi hi wneud ei gwaith hi?

Bydd e'n ddigon; dwi'n sicr o hynny.

Diolch. Oedd gennych chi gwestiwn atodol?

Mae gen i gwestiwn, ond mae e amboutu fy hobby-horse yn fwy nag unrhyw beth arall. Bob tro dwi'n gweld y Gweinidog, mae'n rhywbeth dwi eisiau gofyn, so gyda'ch indulgence chi. Ers yr etholiad diwethaf, dŷn ni wedi clywed lot llai am waith digidol y Llywodraeth yma na beth wnaethom ni yn y Senedd ddiwethaf, ac un o'r pethau dwi'n gwybod bod Mrs Webb wedi bod yn gweithio arno fe yw sut dŷn ni'n sicrhau bod Alexa, a phwy bynnag arall, yn siarad Cymraeg. A dwi'n tueddu meddwl mai un o'r ffyrdd dŷn ni'n hybu defnydd o'r Gymraeg yw i sicrhau bod y dechnoleg newydd i fi—dyw e ddim yn newydd i fy mhlant, ond newydd i fi—yn deall ac yn defnyddio’r Gymraeg. Ac un o'r blaenoriaethau dwi am i chi ganolbwyntio arnynt yn ystod y blynyddoedd nesaf yw sicrhau bod y gwaith yma i sicrhau bod technoleg yn defnyddio’r Gymraeg yn parhau. Ydy hynny'n flaenoriaeth i chi, ac oes gennych chi unrhyw ran o'ch cyllideb sydd wedi ei neilltuo ar gyfer y gwaith yma?

Oes. Nid jest cael blaenoriaeth, rŷn ni wedi cael cynnydd penodol yn ddiweddar yn y maes hwn. Felly, os edrychwch chi ar beth rŷn ni wedi'i wneud gyda Microsoft, ni yw’r Llywodraeth gyntaf yn y byd i gydweithio â nhw i greu Teams sy'n ddwyieithog. Felly, am y tro cyntaf erioed, mae hynny ar gael nawr fel mae e yn Zoom beth bynnag. Felly, partneriaeth rhwng Llywodraeth Cymru a Microsoft sydd wedi creu hynny, ac mae hynny ar gael i bob Llywodraeth a phob corff yn y byd, felly mae hynny'n elfen bwysig, dwi'n credu, o arloesi, ac mae'n caniatáu i gyrff cyhoeddus sy'n aml yn defnyddio Teams, nid Zoom, am resymau penodol—mae hynny'n un enghraifft.

Roeddwn i yn yr Eisteddfod yr haf diwethaf yn cael profi Aberwla, sef platfform virtual reality ar gyfer dysgu Cymraeg yn y cyd-destun trochi, fel eich bod chi’n byw mewn pentref ac yn dysgu’r Gymraeg. Chi’n mynd i'r archfarchnad, chi’n cerdded i lawr y stryd. Mae e’n grêt. Yng Ngwynedd mae e wedi cael ei greu a nawr mae e ar gael ymhob rhan o Gymru. Rŷn ni'n ariannu hynny i gael ei rannu dros Gymru. Mae hynny'n un o'r pethau rŷn ni wedi bod yn ariannu a datblygu. Felly, mae lot o'r pethau yna’n digwydd. Mae'r arian rŷn ni'n ei ddyrannu i M-SParc, er enghraifft, yn Ynys Môn—mae lot o arloesi digidol yn fanna. Roeddwn i gyda nhw llynedd ar ddechrau’r flwyddyn yn sôn am y gwaith maen nhw'n ei wneud fel incubator, os hoffwch chi, i dechnoleg y Gymraeg. Mae lot o stwff diddorol yn digwydd yn fanna hefyd.

Dwi'n falch iawn clywed hynny, ond dyw hwn ddim yn memory test i'r Gweinidog. [Chwerthin.] Wel, dŷch wedi pasio fe, anyway. Mi fuasai fe’n hwylus petai chi’n gallu ysgrifennu atom ni yn rhestru hynny a'r initiatives dŷch chi yn hyrwyddo, achos dwi'n meddwl bod hyn yn hanfodol i'r dyfodol, so dwi'n croesawu hynny.

Hapus i wneud.

Os caf i, efallai, ehangu ar hynny, jest o ran yr elfen hyrwyddo, dod ar draws nifer o'r pethau rydych chi newydd gyfeirio atyn nhw wnes i yn yr Eisteddfod Genedlaethol eleni, gan dreulio lot fawr o amser efo mab 9 oed yn y pentref gwyddoniaeth a thechnoleg. Ydych chi’n credu, o ran sicrhau bod y rhai sydd yn mynd i gael y budd mwyaf, fod yna ddigon o gyllid o ran yr elfen o ran hyrwyddo’r hyn sydd ar gael fel bod pobl yn gallu cael mynediad? Ydy hynny'n rhywbeth o ran y Llywodraeth ei hun, awdurdodau lleol—? Dim ond o ran meddwl sut ydyn ni'n hyrwyddo, oherwydd rydym ni hefyd yn gweld, o ran hyrwyddo addysg Gymraeg ac ati, fod hynny'n gallu efallai amrywio o ran negeseuon o sir i sir a'r pwyslais o ran trochi. Roedd yna bethau ffantastig ar y newyddion y bore yma efo esiamplau efo trochi hwyr ac ati, ond mi oeddwn i'n gwrando ar Radio Cymru ac mae ganddi gynulleidfa graidd. Efallai nid dyna’r gynulleidfa sydd angen clywed y negeseuon yna weithiau. Ydych chi’n credu, dim ond o ran yr elfen hyrwyddo rŵan, o'r hyn sydd ar gael, o ran arloesedd yn sicr, ein bod ni'n gallu gwneud hynny'n ddigonol?

Dwi'n meddwl bod gwahaniaeth rhwng hyrwyddo a marchnata, byddwn i'n ei ddweud. So, mae hyrwyddo yn rhywbeth hollol integredig, onid yw e? Mae lot o'r stwff rŷn ni wedi bod yn ei drafod heddiw yn creu ecosystem o hyrwyddo ei gilydd. Felly, rwy'n credu bod hyrwyddo’n rhywbeth sydd yn digwydd ar draws y gyllideb hon. Os edrychwch chi ar drochi, mae'n dibynnu lle ŷch chi yng Nghymru, onid yw e? Mae’ch profiad chi o drochi yn mynd i amrywio oherwydd mae rhannau o Gymru ar wahanol lefydd ar y llwybr. Felly, fyddech chi ddim efallai yn disgwyl, ble ŷn ni heddiw, fod pob cynnig yn cael ei hyrwyddo yn yr un ffordd oherwydd nad yw’r cynnig mor aeddfed ym mhob rhan o Gymru. Felly, rwy'n credu bod e ychydig yn wahanol. Er enghraifft, un o'r pethau dwi wedi bod yn glir gyda chynghorau lleol yn ei gylch, pan dwi'n cael y trafodaethau un-wrth-un gyda'r arweinwyr, yw pa mor bwysig yw cael strategaeth glir i hyrwyddo addysg Gymraeg, ac mae rhai wedi bod yn fwy llwyddiannus, wrth gwrs, nag eraill. Ond rwy'n credu bod y diwylliant yna wedi newid dros y blynyddoedd diweddaf—bod mwy o ddealltwriaeth beth yw’r nod. Hynny yw, nid jest ateb y galw, ond mynd ati i esbonio manteision a thyfu’r galw ei hun, os hoffwch chi. Felly, rwy'n credu bod y neges honno wedi cael ei chlywed. Ond, wrth gwrs, mae'n rhaid gweld hynny'n digwydd.

Diolch, Weinidog. Gaf i symud ymlaen rŵan at Hefin David?

Diolch, Cadeirydd. Yn dilyn y cyhoeddiad cychwynnol o £2.2 miliwn ar gyfer y ddarpariaeth iaith Gymraeg trochi hwyr, fe wnaeth Llywodraeth Cymru ymrwymo i gyllid ychwanegol o £6.6 miliwn dros dair blynedd. Yn ei bapur tystiolaeth, mae'r Gweinidog yn nodi,

'This current funding round is enabling local authorities to keep in post, or appoint from new, over 60 specialised late immersion teachers/classroom assistants into newly established immersion units or centres.'

Sut mae Llywodraeth Cymru yn sicrhau bod y canlyniadau yn dod yn sgil cyllid penodol?

Diolch am hynny. Mae'n amrywio o le i le beth yw'r defnydd o'r arian hwnnw. Felly, pan wnaethon ni ddyrannu'r gyllideb yn wreiddiol, gwnaeth pob awdurdod lleol yng Nghymru gynnig am, a derbyn, rhan o'r gronfa honno, sydd, yn ei hunan, yn beth pwysig iawn, rwy'n credu. Ond fel roeddwn i jest yn sôn in passing nawr gyda'r Cadeirydd, mae awdurdodau mewn mannau gwahanol ar y llwybr, felly mae'r hyn rŷn ni'n ei ddisgwyl iddyn nhw ei wneud gyda'r gyllideb honno yn wahanol.

Felly, yn fras, os ŷch chi yn y gogledd-orllewin, mae gennych chi ddarpariaeth sydd wedi cael ei sefydlu ers blynyddoedd lawer, felly cynnal hynny ac ehangu hynny yw'r defnydd. Os edrychwch chi ar y de-ddwyrain, jest yn gyffredinol, mae rhai o'r cynghorau llawer cynharach ar eu llwybr tuag at ddarparu trochi. Felly, maen nhw efallai'n datblygu cynlluniau o'r cychwyn cyntaf, yn recriwtio am y tro cyntaf.

Ond, ar y cyfan, costau recriwtio yw'r rhain, naill ai athrawon trochi, cynorthwywyr neu gydlynwyr. Rŷn ni'n credu bod rhyw 60 o swyddi yn dod yn sgil hyn, naill ai cadw swyddi sydd eisoes yno, neu recriwtio newydd. Un o'r pethau sydd yn bwysig i ni yn y maes yma—ac mae'n gyfle pwysig i ni, dwi'n credu, hefyd—yw bod y sgiliau sy'n cael eu defnyddio mewn canolfannau trochi yn rhai arbenigol iawn. Mae'r hyn rŷn ni'n gweld yn digwydd yn effeithiol iawn. Byddwn i'n dweud os ydych chi wedi gweld e gyda'ch llygaid eich hunain, mae'n agos i fod yn wyrthiol, mor gyflym mae'r cynnydd yn digwydd i'r plant sydd yn yr unedau yna.

Ond, y cyfle i ni yw ein bod ni'n gallu prif ffrydio drwy'r system y sgiliau arbenigol sy'n cael eu defnyddio yn y canolfannau trochi. Mae gennym ni rwydwaith hefyd rŷn ni wedi ei sefydlu o ganolfannau sydd yn gallu creu a rhannu arfer da drwy'r system, fel bod llwybr yr awdurdodau lleol sydd efallai â ffordd bellach i fynd yn cyflymu.

Diolch yn fawr iawn o ran hynny. Hefin David, os gennych chi gwestiynau pellach?

Diolch. Hefyd, cyllid grant penodol: a all y Gweinidog egluro'r camau a gymerwyd ers ymateb i'r argymhellion yn dilyn yr arolwg ar effaith COVID-19 ar grwpiau cymunedol, yn benodol ynghylch sefydlu'r cynllun grantiau bach neu'r gronfa her?

Gallaf. Mae amryw bethau wedi digwydd ers inni gael yr adroddiad hwnnw. Efallai'r peth mwyaf o ran value—o ran gwerth—yw'r gronfa o £400,000 rŷn ni wedi'i sefydlu gyda Cwmpas er mwyn creu mentrau cymdeithasol cydweithredol. Cronfa her yw honno, fel bod pobl yn gallu cael rhan ohoni hi, fel roeddwn i'n sôn yn gynharach gydag Alun Davies. Mae honno'n un gronfa.

Rŷn ni wedi creu cronfeydd eraill gydag M-SParc—roeddwn i'n sôn amdanyn nhw yn gynharach—i edrych ar sut y gallwn ni ddefnyddio technoleg i ddenu pobl at y Gymraeg. Mae gennym ni ddwy initiative hyd yn hyn yn y maes hwnnw hefyd. A hefyd—efallai mewn ffyrdd mwy cyfarwydd—cronfa gyda'r WCVA i ddatblygu mwy o wirfoddoli yn y Gymraeg, a hefyd y gefnogaeth dwi wedi sôn amdani eisoes i'r Urdd a'r Eisteddfod Genedlaethol. A hefyd, gyda llaw, y gymdeithas eisteddfodau lleol, rŷn ni wedi'u cefnogi nhw ar gyfer eu gweithgareddau nhw hefyd. Maen nhw wedi bod dan bwysau aruthrol, am resymau amlwg, yn ystod COVID.

Diolch yn fawr iawn. Hefin, oes yna gwestiynau pellach?

Oes. Beth am y cynllun sabathol?

Was there consideration of increasing the funding for that?

Mae'r cynllun sabathol yn un o'r rhaglenni sydd gyda ni o ran cynyddu sgiliau athrawon yn y sector Saesneg. Bues i yng Nghaerdydd yn ddiweddar yn cwrdd gyda cohort a oedd wedi bod trwy'r cwrs, ac mae'n ffantastig nid jest clywed eu hyfedredd nhw yn y Gymraeg, ond hefyd y dulliau roedden nhw'n dysgu o sut i fynd ati i ddysgu'r Gymraeg. Ar y cyfan, athrawon yn y sector gynradd mewn ysgolion Saesneg sydd yn manteisio fwyaf ar hyn.

Rŷn ni wedi cynnal y gyllideb honno, ond hefyd wedi cynyddu'r ddarpariaeth ehangach, felly y gwersi am ddim i athrawon, y gwersi i bobl oed 18 i 25. Rydyn ni'n cydweithio gyda'r consortia ar hyn o bryd i edrych ar sut mae'r holl bethau yna ar y cyd yn gallu creu dilyniant gwell drwy'r system. Ar hyn o bryd, mae rhyw 200 o athrawon y flwyddyn yn gallu manteisio ar y cynllun sabathol. Mae hynny'n costio rhyw £3.6 miliwn i ni. Y costau, ar y cyfan, yw'r costau cyflenwi, y backfill costs, os hoffwch chi. Felly, rhaid edrych ar yr ystod ehangach, rwy'n credu, o ffyrdd o gefnogi athrawon i loywi iaith neu wella safonau ieithyddol.

Diolch. Unrhyw gwestiynau pellach? Na. Diolch. A oes unrhyw un eisiau dod i mewn ar hynny? Gaf i efallai ddychwelyd—? Gan eich bod chi'n rhoi atebion cryno i ni, gaf i ddychwelyd at bwnc gwnes i godi yn gynharach o ran Mudiad Meithrin, efallai? Roeddech chi'n sôn ynglŷn â phwysigrwydd y ddarpariaeth a bod y galw yna o ran ehangu. Un peth roeddwn i wedi'i nodi oedd bod cyllid blynyddol Mudiad Meithrin ddim wedi newid o £3.03 miliwn. Yn amlwg, roeddech chi'n sôn wrthym ni fod yna gynnydd, a bod y galw yna, felly. Ydych chi'n credu bod y cyllid a ddarperir yn ddigonol er mwyn parhau efo'r cynnydd at y targed?

Ydy, mae e, ond rŷn ni wedi hefyd gallu cynyddu'r capasiti o bryd i'w gilydd fel ein bod ni'n gallu—. Rwy'n credu gwnes i sôn am—beth bynnag yw'r term am hyn—y run rate cyfredol o ryw 12 setting y flwyddyn, ond rŷn ni wedi gallu cynyddu'r gyllideb o flwyddyn i flwyddyn. Felly, mewn un flwyddyn, gwnaethon nhw agor 20, er enghraifft, oherwydd ein bod ni'n gallu darparu cyllid ehangach. Ond mae'r gyllideb sydd yno yn sicrhau eu bod nhw ar y trac. Rŷn ni hefyd, gyda llaw, fel roeddwn i'n sôn ynghynt, wedi dyrannu arian i Cwlwm ar gyfer darparu cymwysterau lefel 3 a 5, a chael rhyw 150 o ymarferwyr drwy'r system honno, fel ein bod ni'n gallu ehangu'r gweithlu. Mae hynny'n elfen hanfodol o hyn. Wrth gynyddu'r gweithlu, rydyn ni'n gallu symud yn gynt wedyn gyda'r sefydlu.

Yn sicr. Diolch yn fawr iawn. Yn amlwg, fel pwyllgor, bydd gennym ni ddiddordeb, fel ydych chi'n rhoi adroddiadau rheolaidd inni beth bynnag, o ran hynny. Gaf i hefyd jest holi—? Yn amlwg, dydy'r maes darlledu ddim yn un sydd efo cyfrifoldeb efo chi, ond o ran edrych o ran y Gymraeg, un o'r pethau sydd wedi'i godi gyda ni yn flaenorol fel pwyllgor gan S4C ac eraill oedd o ran y gronfa ar gyfer cynulleidfaoedd ifanc oedd yn cael ei ddarparu gan Lywodraeth Prydain ond a gafodd ei thorri. Dwi'n ymwybodol efallai fod hwn ddim yn faes ydych chi ynddo fo, ond beth roeddwn i eisiau holi ydy: oes yna ystyriaethau neu unrhyw drafodaethau wedi bod gyda'r Gweinidog gyda chyfrifoldeb dros ddarlledu—hynny ydy, Dawn Bowden—o ran pethau fel y gronfa cynulleidfaoedd ifanc? Oherwydd o'r hyn roedden ni'n deall fel pwyllgor, mi oedd o wedi galluogi S4C i fedru buddsoddi mewn nifer o raglenni o ran Cyw, a hefyd o ran cynulleidfaoedd pobl ifanc yn fwy. Yn amlwg, rydyn ni'n gwybod bod pethau fel YouTube ac ati yn allweddol bwysig. Oes yna unrhyw drafodaethau wedi bod o ran y defnydd o'r Gymraeg a'r cysylltiad rhwng y ddwy gyllideb, efallai?

Rŷn ni wedi cael trafodaethau dros cyfnod eithaf hir gydag S4C ynglŷn â'u darpariaeth nhw yn gyffredinol, i gefnogi ein hamcan ni fel Llywodraeth. Mae gan bob ran o'r ecosystem Gymraeg rôl i chwarae yn cyfrannu tuag at hynny. Un o'r pethau rŷn ni wedi bod yn trafod gyda nhw yw'r hyn maen nhw'n darparu o ran y cynulleidfaoedd ieuengaf hefyd. Mae trafodaethau penodol wedi bod yn digwydd yn y cyd-destun hwnnw. Ond rŷn ni newydd gytuno memorandwm dealltwriaeth gydag S4C yn gyffredinol. Dwi ddim yn credu ein bod ni wedi datgan hynny yn gyhoeddus eto, felly dyma breaking news ichi. Ond efallai y gallwn ni ysgrifennu at y pwyllgor am hynny.

Gwych. Diolch yn fawr iawn. Mae'n fuddiol gwybod. Ac, yn amlwg, mae o'n draws-bortffolio, fel rydyn ni wedi sôn yn flaenorol hefyd.

Os caf i fynd ar ôl un cwestiwn pellach, a fedrwch chi—rydyn ni yn mynd yn ôl, rŵan, ychydig—ymhelaethu'n bellach o ran y cynllun grant roeddech chi'n cyfeirio ato fo o ran y llinell wariant yn y gyllideb ar gyfer y Gymraeg, a diben a bwriad yr adolygiad? A fydd yr adolygiad yna'n adlewyrchu ar ganlyniadau'r cyfrifiad ac ydy o'n debygol o arwain at unrhyw ddyraniadau yn ystod y flwyddyn neu wariant dangosol yn y dyfodol?

Yr adolygiad o'r cynllun grant cyffredinol, rŷch chi'n meddwl?

Ie.

Rydyn ni'n edrych ar hyn o bryd os gallwn ni wneud taliadau untro i rai o'r cyrff sy'n derbyn arian wrthym ni i ateb yr argyfwng costau. Felly, mae hynny'n digwydd ar hyn o bryd. Efallai y byddwn ni mewn sefyllfa i ddweud mwy am hynny yn yr wythnosau nesaf. Ond pwrpas yr adolygiad yw edrych a ydy'r model sydd gennym ni, y strwythur sydd gennym ni o ariannu, yr hyn rydyn ni'n gofyn wrth ein partneriaid, yn gyson ag amcanion 'Cymraeg 2050'. Dyw'r amcanion ddim yn newid. Wrth gwrs, mae pethau fel y data a gawn ni o'r cyfrifiad a'r adolygiad blynyddol yn bwydo i mewn i'n dealltwriaeth cyfredol ni o sut mae'r ymyriadau yn gweithio. Felly, bydd pob corff rŷn ni'n ariannu yn moyn edrych ar y data yna i weld a ydyn nhw'n gorfod newid yr hyn maen nhw'n ei wneud i ymateb iddo fe, wrth gwrs. Dwi ddim yn rhagweld y byddwn ni'n gwneud newidiadau sylfaenol o fewn y flwyddyn ariannol hon yn sgil hynny, ond yn y flwyddyn ariannol nesaf, mae'n debygol y bydd newidiadau'n dod yn sgil canlyniadau'r adolygiad a hefyd beth byddwn ni'n deall o'r cyfrifiad. Felly, y gyllideb nesaf, mwy na thebyg.

Diolch yn fawr iawn. Oes gan unrhyw aelodau eraill o'r pwyllgor unrhyw gwestiynau pellach? Mi fyddwn ni'n trafod y dystiolaeth yn hwyrach ymlaen. Os oes yna rai cwestiynau pellach, dim ond o ran rhai manylion, a fyddai'n iawn i ni ysgrifennu atoch chi, Weinidog, os oes yna unrhyw gwestiynau pellach?

Wrth gwrs. Croeso.

Diolch yn fawr iawn. A gaf i ddiolch o galon ichi am ddod aton ni heddiw ac am y dystiolaeth? A hefyd diolch i Bethan ac Owain am ymuno efo ni. Diolch.

Bwyllgor, os cawn ni symud ymlaen, os gwelwch yn dda, at yr eitem nesaf ar yr agenda, dim ond i nodi'r papurau sydd ger ein bron ni heddiw—dim ond i fi eu cyrraedd nhw. Mae gennym ni bapurau i'w nodi, sef 4.1 a llythyr o dan 4.2. A oes unrhyw un eisiau crybwyll unrhyw beth yn eu cylch nhw neu godi unrhyw beth ar y record? Na. Hapus i'w nodi nhw, felly. Diolch yn fawr iawn.

Gwnawn ni symud ymlaen, felly, at eitem 5, ac a gaf i gynnig o dan Reol Sefydlog 17.42 i benderfynu gwahardd y cyhoedd o weddill y cyfarfod hwn ac o'r ddwy eitem gyntaf yn y cyfarfod sydd wedi ei drefnu ar 2 Chwefror 2023? Ydy pawb yn hapus i gytuno hynny? Diolch yn fawr iawn. Mi awn ni'n breifat, felly.