Yes. I'm content to note, and there's a great deal of information that is important to us all in these letters. But specifically in terms of 3.4, I just wanted to note that I was very disappointed that there wasn't additional information in terms of what the specific targets were for the world cup. We have asked a number of times now for this information and we haven't received any specific information. So, it's going to be difficult to understand how the evaluation will take place without knowing what the targets were in the first instance. And that, perhaps, will be of assistance in the future, hopefully the next time that Wales takes part in the world cup, so we need to push that, I think.
May I also note, in terms of 3.5, Chair, that I'm very pleased to see that response? I also, in terms of 3.9 and 3.10, noted the difference, perhaps, between the response we received from Cardiff Council to say that they hadn't received additional funding, but that there was public funding that had been allocated. So, I also echo your comment in terms of the tone of that letter. That's clearly an issue for Cardiff Council, but it is a nationally important asset too, as we've previously discussed, and I would hope that the tone, in terms of noting that we perhaps weren't being fair in terms of our comments, that it is important to note that this was a cross-party letter by us as a committee.
And finally, if I may, I wanted to draw attention to letter 3.18. This is an issue that we haven't yet discussed in terms of the proposal to potentially close the Museum of Cardiff. I think this is something that will be a wider problem across Wales, because local museum services aren't on a statutory footing, and with the genuine challenges facing local government, this is perhaps something that we should keep an eye on, because we clearly have seen that this has been a very important resource for the local community, as it's won awards, it's received public funding, and it does important work. So, this is something, in terms of services that aren't on a statutory footing but are culturally important: what is the future for this kind of organisation and provision? Because the model that is proposed poses a risk that it might not then be a museum to all intents and purposes. What does that mean for the future of those collections and for engagement?